| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Jerick Ludhowe
JLT corp
447
   |
Posted - 2013.05.07 12:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
Gunther Nhilathok wrote:I have an idea. Scrap the new navy BCs and give us back our canes.
OP ships are bad for overall game balance... Even morons are capable of understanding this
|
Jerick Ludhowe
JLT corp
448
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 16:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Chessur wrote:
Canes were never OP in the first place. I wish forums would not be filled with idiots who simply spout of talking points, and repeat lines that are not based in fact
If you think that the original cane was not op, you're bad and you should feel bad.
It had nothing to do with "talking points" it had everything to do with over the top slot numbers, mobility, and fitting potential.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
JLT corp
448
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 13:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Perihelion Olenard wrote:
While it may not have the same model as the Myrmidon, the Eos will be a drone command ship once command ships are updated. Amarr won't have a drone command ship even though they have a tech 1 drone BC. For some odd reason it gets missiles.
I'd put money on that the eos will be utilizing the myrmidon model once command ship changes go live shortly after summer xpack.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
JLT corp
448
|
Posted - 2013.05.17 11:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:YES !! -and another hard point please 
**** no, ship is already a small scale beast, last thing we need is for it to be the overall dps king as well....
There is no way in hell that the cane is getting a 7th turret slot.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
JLT corp
455
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 13:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jureth22 wrote:i`ve been playing with em in eft for a while now and it seems like all of them are even and useless.i wouldnt release them with oddysey,unless a major update comes along for them.
The fact that hoards of people think they suck as well as ar op probably means the balance is pretty close to spot on...
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Cup Of ConKrete
459
|
Posted - 2013.05.26 11:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Jerick Ludhowe wrote:Jureth22 wrote:i`ve been playing with em in eft for a while now and it seems like all of them are even and useless.i wouldnt release them with oddysey,unless a major update comes along for them. The fact that hoards of people think they suck as well as ar op probably means the balance is pretty close to spot on... People that say that they are OP are just he ones disregarding their cost or showing how they step into the role of the battleships. They are not impressive (specially the hurricane) but have too many HP to be BC, since they overstep on attack Battleship levels. But that is moslty because battleshisp themselves are too weak.
they follow the progression of navy ships just like every other navy ship... Essentially +50% ehp and another slot.
As for their tank being too high... BS still have more ehp and more dps, and more range, and more cap, and more drones.... I really don't understand the whole argument of "NAVY BC GOING TO REPLACE BS" crap, it simply does not make sense. |
Jerick Ludhowe
Error-404
460
|
Posted - 2013.05.27 17:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jonas Sukarala wrote:
But what does that mean??? .....in real terms the price of navy battlecruisers will be??????
probably around 150-170m
Cheaper than command ships by a fair margin.
|
Jerick Ludhowe
Error-404
465
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 13:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Perihelion Olenard wrote:Ireland VonVicious wrote:We don't need a 4th version of the brutix.
We need a BC that has 125 bandwidth.
Stop being lazy CCP. You already have a navy cruiser with 125 drone bandwidth. What else could the navy Myrmidon offer besides more turrets and a larger drone bay over the navy Vexor?
This is the real reason the navy version is the brutix... A navy myrmidon would simply displace the nvexor far more than the nbrutix displaces the nexe.
|
| |
|